Posts Tagged ‘fha loan’

When Will YOUR Housing Market Recover?

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

When will YOUR housing market recover?

By Marcie Geffner

Pundits love to make predictions as to when home prices will stabilize in U.S. housing markets. But even well-respected forecasters and analysts may disagree, and even if a forecast proves true nationally, your local market may behave in a wildly different way. This disconnect between broad-stroke forecasts and small-scale local markets presents quite a puzzle for homebuyers and home sellers, who need to make major financial decisions on the basis of facts, not fiction. If you want or need to sell your home, how do you know the best time to put it on the market?

The national housing market is more than large enough to encompass a wide variety of trends in different places and on different timelines. And that means, at the end of the day, you’ll need to rely on your own best judgment to make decisions for yourself and your family.

Local data may be more meaningful for homebuyers, sellers
So how can you figure out when home prices and sales hit bottom and begin to recover in your neighborhood? You may need to do your own research to find the answer. Dig up facts and figures about your own city or town and then combine that data with information about national trends to formulate your own conclusions.

Plenty of data are as close as your keyboard, though the process of sifting through it may take quite a lot of time and thoughtful analysis. If you’re tempted to skip out on what may seem like a burdensome homework assignment and instead rely on your own gut instincts, you might want to take a tip from Stuart Gabriel, director of UCLA’s Ziman Center for Real Estate in Los Angeles. He says, “some investors are very instinctual and this has worked out well for them, but most of us rely on the acquisition of information.”

Get your data straight from the original source
For starters, here’s an overview of some of the data and the organizations and agencies that collect and disseminate it:

Supply of for-sale homes a key indicator
If you don’t want to indulge in that much research, zero in on the most important statistic, which, Gabriel suggests, may be the supply, or “inventory,” of homes that are for sale in your local area.

“There is a whole litany (of factors that affect housing) — home sales, housing starts, building permits, house prices — and all of those are important indicators,” he says, “but the inventory numbers in particular are really important.”

The general rule is that more months of supply indicates a weaker housing market. Many months suggests plenty of homes are for sale or the pace of sales is slow. Those conditions are indicative of a market that favors buyers. Few months suggests a limited number of homes for sale or the pace of sales is fast. Those factors are indicative of a market that favors sellers.

Many local Realtor associations and multiple listing services, or MLS, collect and publish this type of information. Ideally, the data should be segmented by locale, type of home and price range, though that degree of specificity is rarely on offer.

Housing starts increase supply of for-sale homes

Two other important housing market indicators are residential building permits and new-home construction starts, according to Gabriel. Bernard Markstein, senior economist at the National Association of Home Builders, or NAHB, in Washington, D.C., agrees. These indicators are measured by local government building officials and the U.S. Census Bureau. A spike in permits or starts may indicate more optimism among homebuilders, but can also suggest a dramatic rise in the supply of for-sale homes in the near future.Housing starts generally are a better leading indicator than housing permits because “housing starts turn into homes for sale very quickly,” Gabriel says.

The NAHB’s Web site offers access to a wealth of forecasts and economic and housing data from the association and government agencies.

Markstein also cites local employment trends and unemployment rates as important indicators of local housing market conditions.

“Employment is important because ultimately people need a place to live, and if people are moving into an area because employment is expanding, that will be positive for homeowners,” he says.

Most local newspapers publish stories about large employers’ hiring and downsizing plans as well as unemployment figures. Employment data also can be obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Homebuyers and sellers can also glean useful insights from reports and newsletters published by the Federal Reserve and its 12 district banks, Markstein suggests. Each of the banks puts out its own periodicals about local economic conditions, and these reports usually contain sections about the outlook for commercial and residential real estate. The Fed’s Beige Book and map of the district banks may help you locate these reports.

Quality of data is crucial to good analysis

Much like do-it-yourself remodeling, personal economic analysis is not without certain pitfalls.

Risks of do-it-yourself analysis:
  • Inaccurate, incomplete, faulty or outdated data, which may be misleading.
  • Small-scale surveys, which may suffer from sampling errors.
  • Individual data points, which may not represent a true trend line.

It’s important to track inventory, starts, unemployment and other figures over time and compare them to historical highs, lows and averages to understand their importance, Gabriel suggests.

“Look at these numbers relative to the typical level that would exist in a period of economic growth to see whether the levels are aberrantly high or aberrantly low. Look over a long time frame and measure existing levels relative to, say, a long-run average to get a sense of where (the market) is in the cycle,” he says.

And remember: In housing markets, “a long time frame” usually means a number of years, not just a few months.

Vacating a Jointly Owned Property- Quick FHA Fact

Friday, September 11th, 2009

If you are vacating a residence that will remain occupied by the co-borrower, he/she is required to obtain a NEW FHA mortgage loan.

Acceptable situations are:

1.) Instances of divorce, after which the vacating spouse will buy a new home, or
2.) One of the co-borrowers  will vacate the existing property

-

    Is FHA in Trouble?

    Thursday, September 10th, 2009

    Just this morning, I was reading an article that I came across regarding a couple things that are going on with the Federal Housing Administration (FHA)….and it wasn’t pretty.

    Basically what’s going on right now is that there are justifiable rumors that the FHA’s reserves (capital) are hovering around dangerous levels.

    Congress requires that the magic number FHA needs to be at is 2%. At the moment, its speculated to be down to about 3% (down from 6.5%  in 2007) and if it falls below that mark, Uncle Sam has to come in and save the day once again. (Is it just me, or is this a never-ending cycle? Has anyone seen AIG’s stock quote recently?)

    At the moment, FHA’s defaults (90 days+) are nearing 8% and depleting a good portion of FHA’s reserves. While that number may not seem that HUGE, you have to see how all this links together.

    Several high-cost areas in the US got hit pretty hard the past couple of years. What goes up, must come down, right?

    Well because of those declining markets, FHA decided to increase their loan limits and availability to accommodate the supply/demand in those areas. Who has $140,000 stashed under their mattress in CA to buy that $700,000 home? Not too many people. Well, who has around $25,000? Get the point?

    And while this WAS needed to help stimulate buyers, you have to think of what happens on the flip-side. When that $5,000 (est) payment can’t be made anymore, and its time to jump ship, and who gets stuck with the bill? FHA.

    FHA then has to tap into their reserves to make good on this.

    Think about this for a moment:

    In Texas, about 4-5 homes have to foreclose to match that ONE home in California. The odds of 4-5 consumers simultaneously defaulting is not that likely, unless they’re Madoff’s advisors.

    The point I’m trying to make is that the high-cost areas are affecting FHA a little bit more than other more stable areas. While I am not saying that FHA lending shouldn’t be available here, I think it would be a good idea (especially now) to implement some more stringent measures before approving every Tom, Dick, and Harry that apply. Last thing we ALL want is to wave bye bye to FHA.

    The remainder of the year will be quite interesting. An important incentive is coming to an end ($8k Tax Credit), and as for interest rates, well, let’s just hope they keep steady. Too many good things coming to an end is not a good thing.

    Tommy’s 2 Cents

    I would safely venture to say that FHA credit score requirements will be going up here in the upcoming months, as well as a larger down payments later down the line. While FHA loans have been the hot product, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Conventional loans start to SLOWLY creep back in and create a “2nd hand FHA loan” if capital continues to diminish as it has.

    Remember what happened with Sub-Prime loans? High Demand, High Supply, POOF- they’re gone! History always repeats itself, let’s just hope we’ve learned our lesson the first time, and we don’t screw up FHA, especially for Dawson’s sake.

    Don't Cheat Home-Buyer's Tax Credit

    Friday, September 4th, 2009

    By Kenneth R. Harney

    The IRS has an urgent message for would-be home purchasers: Make the most of the $8,000 first-time-buyer tax credit before it disappears Dec. 1 — if you qualify.

    But if you don’t truly qualify, don’t try to play games with the credit. The IRS already has 24 criminal investigations of suspected fraud underway around the country. It has executed seven search warrants, and last month a tax preparer in Florida entered a guilty plea on federal charges of fraud in connection with the first-time-buyer credit. He’s awaiting sentencing and faces up to three years in prison, a $250,000 fine or both.

    Congress’s two versions of the first-time-buyer credit — a repayable $7,500 credit in 2008, and this year’s more generous $8,000 credit that does not have to be repaid — have stimulated home sales nationwide. But they’ve also become irresistible temptations for dishonest taxpayers to cash in and claim bogus refunds.

    Claiming the credit looks so easy: You just fill out IRS form 5405, list the address of the house you bought, mail it in and wait a month or two for your money. Who’s going to check on whether you really qualify under the definition of first-time buyer — someone who hasn’t owned a principal residence in the previous three years — and that you’re eligible on income and other factors?

    With thousands of people buying houses and claiming tax credits, who’s going to be able to check all those filings? The answer from the IRS: We are. The agency said it uses “sophisticated computer screening tools to quickly identify returns that may contain fraudulent claims for the first-time homebuyer credit.”

    The IRS won’t discuss the nature of its screening, but it’s clear from the number of ongoing investigations that claims for the credit are getting special scrutiny.

    In the case of the Florida tax preparer, one tip-off evidently was the sheer number of clients who claimed credits as first-time buyers. James Otto Price III of Jacksonville entered a plea of guilty to charges that he fraudulently submitted returns claiming tax credits for 15 clients, some of whom apparently did not understand what he was doing.

    According to a summary of the facts agreed to by Price as part of his plea agreement, he admitted that in February he met with a client who told Price that she didn’t want to buy a house. But Price insisted that she qualified for the credit because “she had two jobs.” He then wrote in a house address on the form 5405, claiming the client closed on the purchase Jan. 5. When she received her $7,500 credit, Price took $1,000 of it for himself.

    In the plea agreement, Price admitted following a similar pattern in 14 other tax returns.

    IRS spokesman Terry Lemons declined to discuss the ongoing criminal investigations of taxpayers claiming the home-buyer credit. He said the investigations involve individuals as well as tax-return preparers.

    The IRS doesn’t “want to discourage people from taking advantage of the credit,” Lemons said, but it wants them to be certain that they’ve read through the eligibility rules so they don’t end up with audits, back taxes and late penalties. On the list of things that can disqualify buyers:

    – Purchasing your house from a “related person.” That’s a broad category of people and entities, ranging from immediate family members — a spouse, parents, children, grandparents, grandchildren — to a corporation or partnership in which you have more than a 50 percent ownership stake.

    – Buying a home with a spouse who is ineligible, even if you are eligible individually.

    – Acquiring a house through an inheritance or gift.

    – Financing the house through a tax-exempt mortgage bond program.

    – Making too much money — in excess of $95,000 of modified adjusted gross income for singles, $170,000 or more for married joint filers.

    What are the downsides if you claim the credit erroneously and do not intentionally defraud the government? If you are audited, the IRS most likely will ask for the full credit amount back, plus interest and a late-payment penalty.

    Bottom line: Don’t let this year’s tax credit pass you by if you meet the criteria. And if you don’t, beware of slick-talking professional tax preparers who tell you that you do.

    Come on 7's! Daddy Needs a New Roof!

    Monday, June 15th, 2009

    Here’s an excerpt from one of my favorite movies, A Bronx Tale. Please follow closely:

    MushSonny: Get this over with, Mush.

    Mush: Come on, dice. Baby needs a new pair of shoes. Come on, seven!

    Mush: Come on! Come on, dice!

    Sonny: I don’t even have to look.

    (Spectator) And seven!

    Mush: Craps! I’m out!

    Sonny: Get him out of here! Man never hit a number in his life!

    As we all have been following lately, rates have been pretty damn good. I mean REALLY DAMN GOOD. That was…until a week or so ago.

    I was working with one of my clients and highly advised him to lock in his rate at 4.875% on a 30 Year Fixed, however he decided to float instead of paying a “little” bit more for an extra 15 days. Why? Only he knows.

    He is now at a 5.75%. (crickets chirping)

    Ladies and Gentlemen- DO NOT END UP LIKE EDDIE MUSH (featured above) and crap out in this market!!! I cannot stress to you enough how important it is to secure a good rate in when you see it. I am coming across several people daily that REALISTICALLY expected rates to go down to the high 3′s because the media puts their dirty little paws on it, and in the end, they lose out on something great.

    Would you listen to Al Roker talking to you about mortgage rates or me about weather? I really hope not.

    The loan officers that are still here (you can tell who the seasoned ones are) are here for a reason. We have flourished through the good, withstood the bad, study the market, subscribe to various sources of mortgage news, and have a pretty good grasp on what’s going on.

    Many feel that when the loan officer says “Mrs. Jones, you need to lock in,” it is mostly viewed as a sales pitch to get your commitment rather than advice, and many clients back off.

    I mean this is normal. I can understand it and would probably do the same.

    Do this. Next time your loan officer does this, ask them “Why should I secure this rate Mr. Mortgage? And don’t tell me rates are going to go up. Explain WHY” and see what they say. If studdering occurs, move on to the next mortgage professional. If they can advise you with detailed information, they’re a keeper!

    In the end, it is only YOU that will win…or lose.

    Tommy’s 2 cents

    DON’T BE GREEDY.

    Should You Use Your $8,000 Tax Credit as Your Down Payment?

    Saturday, May 16th, 2009

    So there has been a lot of rumors regarding the $8000 first time home buyer tax credit and that it can be used as a down payment for a new home with an FHA loan.

    At first, I thought it was just another “mortgage scam”. Trust you me, the real mortgage industry always leaves room for the next “million-dollar-idea”. If you pay close attention, you may even end up seeing your next door neighbor on the 6 o’clock news getting caught for selling “ARMS” from the back of his van in a dark alley.

    After doing a little bit of research to see the legitimacy of this rumor, I ended up finding the official HUD Mortgagee Letter 2009-15.

    Who Can Offer It

    Let’s begin with who can offer this “loan” on a loan. (Is that a conundrum?)

    According the letter, Federal, state, local governmental agencies, non-profit governmental subsidiaries, and FHA-Approved nonprofits will be able to offer this to home buyers.

    How It Works?

    Essentially, this is a bridge loan. You are borrowing this money for a short amount of time until you get your tax credit, and then it is paid back to these agencies.

    What happens is you are taking out a second lien on your home, and that amount CANNOT be more than:

    Down Payment + Closing Costs + Pre-Paid Expenses

    Here is a list of some more facts on how this works:

    1.) You cannot get any cash back at closing.
    2.) You will have a deadline to pay this money back, and if you do not, principal and interest will begin automatically. (What a concept!)
    3.) If payments are required, it will be calculated as a monthly liability when qualifying for the loan.
    4.) If payments are deferred, it must be for at least 36 months and will not be used against you when qualifying.

    I cannot stress to you enough -BE VERY CAUTIOUS with this type of transaction. It leaves so much room for deception, and if you end up in the wrong hands, you may kiss your $8k tax credit goodbye very fast!

    While it may bring an influx of new potential buyers to Realtors and open a lot of doors to potential buyers, it is a double-edged sword and I do not particularly agree with it. In my opinion, it can do more bad than good and is basically bringing back “100% financing” and that is part of what has caused the “Mortgage Meltdown”.

    I would suggest stopping and thinking as to why many down-payment assistance programs went bye-bye towards the end of 2008. It was simply because more buyers defaulted on those types of loans. The LAST THING we need is the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) getting into financial issues.

    Tommy’s 2 Cents:

    Use it IF you absolutely HAVE to. The $8,000 is yours one way or another.

    Identity-of-Interest Transaction Down Payments

    Thursday, May 14th, 2009

    An Identity-of-Interest transaction is where a sales transaction is made between parties with family/business relationships.

    To break it down very simply, and this is USUALLY always the case, when a family member sells to ANOTHER family member, FHA looks at that as an Identity-of-Interest Transaction.

    I get at least 1-2 calls per month with this scenario, and want to post it on my mortgage blog to educate YOU, the consumer.

    So even though FHA has a minimum down payment requirement of 3.5%, in THIS case, you would have to put down 15% percent.

    Here is ONE of the exceptions to this rule:

    1. The family member has rented the property for at least 6 months predating the contract, in which case a rental agreement will be needed.

    If you are in this type of  situation and do not have the 15% to put down, feel free to contact me for more info and some other tips that may help you out!

    Mortgage Tip of the Day- Calculating Overtime and Bonus Income

    Thursday, February 26th, 2009

    When trying to calculate OVERTIME and BONUS income, its a little confusing.

    Here’s how it works:

    1. You must provide a minimum of at least 24 months of overtime in order for us to count it for income.
    2. If on your current paystub it shows less than the previous 2 years of overtime, we can only use the YTD (Year-to-Date) Average; the most conservative approach.

    Here’s a quick example:

    If you made $20,000 in overtime in 2007, $50,000 in 2008, and $800 in 2009 YTD so far, we can only use $400 (the average since we are in February).

    Now listen closely. If your overtime DECLINED in the past 2 years, this will have to be reviewed and is subject to review by the underwriter.

    SubPrime Greed or Governmental Ignorance?

    Thursday, January 15th, 2009

    I have voluntarily stopped watching news. Seriously.

    What can CNN, FOX News, or even your local news tell us that we haven’t seen, or better yet, experienced first hand in this wild real estate market the past year or so?

    Absolutely nothing!

    If I wanted negativity, I would ask my Uncle Frank how his prostate is holding up.

    All we hear is Foreclosure this, Subprime and Predatory Lending that, and geez if I hear the word “Recession” one more time, I’m going to stop what I’m doing, catch the first canoe out, and start a fruitful career as a monk in the West Indies.

    Who’s to blame? A LOT of different people in different places.

    The main point of this article is to show you why we didn’t even NEED Subprime loans to begin with, and how we could have altogether avoided  a good chunk of the mess we’re digging ourselves out of now by having more skilled, licensed, and knowledgeable mortgage professionals well versed with an FHA loan.

    Read closely. I write “skilled, licensed, and knowledgeable.”

    Millions of borrowers signed on the dotted line for a Subprime loan when in fact it wasn’t even necessary to qualify in the first place.

    Here’s why.

    Subprime loans were designed to qualify buyers who didn’t “traditionally” meet the standard criteria to qualify for a mortgage. Usually the ideal candidate had credit that was dinged, late pays on accounts, not a lot of money in the bank, etc.

    The main one, in my opinion, was credit score. Believe it or not, I remember you could get a house if you had a 500 score, and the kicker was, you didn’t even need to PROVE income! How ridiculous is that?

    So the best way to understand this is put yourself in the shoes of a Realtor, a Loan Officer, the Broker, the Banker, the Appraiser, the Title Company, Wall Street, Investors, Surveyors, Inspectors, so forth and so on.

    As you can see, it’s not just a few people that were profiting from these types of loan. Why would somebody mess up a good thing? Everyone was making money!

    So my next question is:

    If I told you that I had $100 in one hand, but I can hand you $75 right now, what would you tell me?

    “Buddy, I’m right here. Fork it over!”

    Now if I told you I had $100 in the other hand, but I would agree to give you $10 a month for the next 10 months, what would you tell me then?

    “Um, I’ll take option 1… and now please!”

    Think about that one.

    Anyone can argue that the supply/demand curve in that type of market would not sustain my 2 questions above. It’s just like poker. “Push all in when you have the best hand.”

    But that is what got us in trouble.

    This brings me to FHA Financing. (This isn’t NEW by the way)

    We, as “mortgage professionals”, could of easily taken hand #2, slow and steady, giving our clients BETTER RATES, getting paid MORE COMMISSION, and not giving an Oak tree a $750,000 Stated Mortgage Loan.

    Most took hand #1. Most of those folks are now broke, and working at a retail banking center making 20% of what they WERE making back then. Their bills are still the same.

    The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) was created by Congress in 1934 when the housing industry was hurting- kind of like how it is now. The main purpose of it was to fuel the “American Dream” as back then, the US was mostly a nation of renters.

    So why is it that all these mortgage brokers and bankers were originating Subprime loans this whole time when FHA was available? Was it greed or ignorance?

    The answer is BOTH, but mostly IGNORANCE.

    During the Subprime days, any Joe Shmoe could graduate from Jack in the Box University (nothing against Jack- I love him), easily get their loan officer’s license, get BEGGED by a mortgage company to start (if you could leave fog residue on a mirror by breathing on it, you were HIRED!), and begin originating loans with absolutely NO experience or training.

    The problem was that most of these mortgage brokers weren’t any smarter either!

    All the brokers knew was Subprime.

    They were letting these people ADVISE CLIENTS ON THEIR BIGGEST DEBT OF THEIR LIFE!!!! Can you believe that?

    They sold easy stated income loans that required less work and never did their homework on educating the clients. It was easy money and it was FAST money.

    Now, I think if these guys were not ignorant to begin with, their greed would have actually BENEFITED the real estate industry.

    How you ask?

    Super simple.

    Well during the dark age of Subprime lending, a typical Subprime loan would either be on a 30 year fixed or Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) with interest rates ranging from 7.5% to 12%. Of course the higher the rate, the more commission the lender pays to the loan officer. On average, loan officers would make between 1%-2% in commission, but give rates that sucked! An FHA loan on the other hand can pay a mortgage broker/mortgage banker the same if not double what a Subprime loan would pay, except that the rate would be in the 5%-6.25% back then!

    Lower payments, less foreclosures, DOCUMENTED income, etc. It wouldn’t SOLVE the crisis, but would have definitely cushioned the real estate fall.

    So why didn’t mortgage brokers and bankers originate FHA loans?

    1. Because they didn’t know about FHA or didn’t know how to originate them
    2. Because most loan officers were self employed contract employees and FHA only allows for W2 employees, or
    3. Because their mortgage broker or banker was not licensed to originate FHA loans.

    Today’s FHA mortgages are yesterday’s Subprime mortgage. Or is it today’s FHA mortgages SHOULD have been yesterday’s FHA mortgage? With fewer options left these days, people are running in droves to FHA financing, but be careful. LEARN FROM PAST MISTAKES. The exact same can happen with FHA if not regulated properly.

    The lesson learned (what I preach): Knowledge goes a long way in this industry.

    For buyers reading this article, please make sure that your mortgage representative knows this business! Make sure they are not just another Joe Shmoe trying to make an extra quick buck without truly earning it.

    What the FHA Needs To Get the Job Done

    Friday, October 3rd, 2008

    In the current credit squeeze, if you have less than a 20 percent down payment, there’s pretty much only one major source of mortgage financing available: the Federal Housing Administration, the Depression-era home loan insurance agency that still offers 3 percent down, 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages with consumer-friendly credit standards, even on jumbo loans in high-cost areas of California and the East Coast.

    But there is a potentially troublesome problem looming for the FHA: New loan volume is exploding — tripling in the past 12 months alone — and Congress has handed the agency the responsibility for almost all the government’s efforts to keep economically distressed homeowners out of foreclosure by refinancing their unaffordable loans.

    The FHA says it needs to hire more staff and upgrade its technology to be able to handle the crush of new business, but it complains that Congress hasn’t appropriated the necessary funds — $65 million — to do the job fast enough. Capitol Hill appropriations committee staff dispute some of that, but the specifics of the arguments over dollar amounts aren’t the issue.

    The real question is this: Can a government agency whose market share dropped below 3 percent during the heyday of the subprime boom now properly handle explosive volume rocketing it to an estimated market share of 30 percent this year? Are both the agency and Congress — which controls the purse strings — up to the task?

    Mortgage industry, home building and real estate experts worry about the possible consequences of shifting too heavy a share of the mortgage market too quickly to an agency that may be inadequately staffed or funded. Howard Glaser, who served during the Clinton administration as acting general counsel for HUD, the parent department for the FHA, worries that loading on too much business without properly funding staff and technology upgrades raises the odds of breakdowns.

    “FHA is assuming the risks of a mortgage market abandoned by private investors — without the risk management tools,” he said. “My fear is that next year at this time, we will be debating an FHA bailout.”

    Steve O’Connor, senior vice president of the Mortgage Bankers Association, agreed there’s danger lurking in the massive increases in business going to the FHA. “You just can’t expect to fit that amount down the same size pipe — you’ve got to expand the size of the pipe” by funding additional staff and technology, he said. “It’s a very serious concern.”

    Other industry groups, including the National Association of Home Builders and the National Association of Realtors voice similar worries. Dick Gaylord, president of the Realtors, said “if [the FHA] is truly going to serve its growing constituency,” it will need more money and people.

    The FHA — for years the forgotten federally controlled stepchild of an industry dominated by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Wall Street mortgage bond machines — is now insuring more than 140,000 new loans a month, according to agency statistics. It has $400 billion in outstanding loans in its insurance portfolio and runs its home mortgage business with 937 employees in offices spread around the country. The agency wants authorization to add 160 employees immediately.

    Though historically a resource for first-time buyers, minorities and people with imperfect credit, the FHA increasingly is the go-to place for people who have above-average credit backgrounds but lack — or choose not to use — large amounts of down-payment cash. In August, according to agency data, approximately 23 percent of new FHA home purchasers had FICO credit scores above 720 — far beyond the proportion of prior years. In the same month, just 12 percent had FICO scores below 600.

    With mortgage limits extending into the jumbo category, the agency is attracting large numbers of customers from high-cost areas of the country, especially California and the mid-Atlantic states. One of 10 new borrowers in August was from California.

    To some mortgage lenders and loan officers, the FHA is now the main game in town. “Nothing competes with them,” said Paul Skeens, chief executive of Colonial Mortgage Group in Waldorf.

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both now in federal conservatorship, have steadily added fees to the point where “they just aren’t competing with FHA on down payments or costs,” Skeens said. In 2001 and 2002, Skeens’ firm did just one-quarter of 1 percent of its volume in the FHA. Now it’s 60 percent.

    “The last thing we need right now, with the shape the housing market is in,” he said, “is for FHA not to function well.”

    By Kenneth R. Harney